Comments on: Coming to terms with climate change http://cop15post.com/2009/12/18/news/coming-to-terms-with-climate-change/ Climate Change Conference Copenhagen 2009 Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:18:40 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: SUMIhttp://cop15post.com/2009/12/18/news/coming-to-terms-with-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-282 SUMI Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:31:37 +0000 http://cop15post.com/?p=1623#comment-282 the fact is that we can't stop emission .as long as there is development there is always some harm to the environment.we can't stop industries ,factories and running of cars.only we can do is to adopt some clean technology and made maximum utilization of renewable energy though it cost very high still we do some research on renewable energy .both development and environment should go together without harming each other. the fact is that we can’t stop emission .as long as there is development there is always some harm to the environment.we can’t stop industries ,factories and running of cars.only we can do is to adopt some clean technology and made maximum utilization of renewable energy though it cost very high still we do some research on renewable energy .both development and environment should go together without harming each other.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Jack Poynterhttp://cop15post.com/2009/12/18/news/coming-to-terms-with-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-185 Jack Poynter Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:27:22 +0000 http://cop15post.com/?p=1623#comment-185 AGW has been sold to us like a house lot in a swamp, instead of simply doing the science and proving it with antagonistic peer review.It fails the smell test; it looks like propaganda, it's presented like propaganda, it's supported by protests, sneers, denigration and group-think like propaganda. That's why thinking people are leery of the theory, not because of what the silly newspapers say.Do the work, submit the work to public review, and I mean all comers, especially the people you don't like, and we'll see then. AGW has been sold to us like a house lot in a swamp, instead of simply doing the science and proving it with antagonistic peer review.

It fails the smell test; it looks like propaganda, it’s presented like propaganda, it’s supported by protests, sneers, denigration and group-think like propaganda. That’s why thinking people are leery of the theory, not because of what the silly newspapers say.

Do the work, submit the work to public review, and I mean all comers, especially the people you don’t like, and we’ll see then.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Grahamhttp://cop15post.com/2009/12/18/news/coming-to-terms-with-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-183 Graham Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:22:04 +0000 http://cop15post.com/?p=1623#comment-183 Perhaps you should consider "Luminiferous Ether" of the 19th century. Scientist working on wave theory of light took for granted that there had to be a medium for propagation of lightwaves.My point is that "A lot of very smart people, can be wrong". Perhaps you should consider “Luminiferous Ether” of the 19th century. Scientist working on wave theory of light took for granted that there had to be a medium for propagation of lightwaves.

My point is that “A lot of very smart people, can be wrong”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

]]>